Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Should the woman take the responsibility?

I was learning about teratology today in class, which is basically environmental/external factor other than the fetal gene that cause fetus malformation. The professor (a woman) brings up an example in the end of the class that a young woman came to her after a car accident. The patients was unaware that she was pregnant at the time of the car accident and during her treatment at the ER and OR she got a x-ray and anethnestia for her surgery. She came to my professor to ask about the probability that her baby have congential defect. After carefully analyze the patient's record and taken everything into consideration, she determined that the patient only have a slight chance above the normal chance of having a malformation baby. But the patient decided to have an abortion eventually base on the information she received. The woman later sue the driver of the other car for her loss of pregnancy. The comment my professor made was that the woman did not take responsibility of her own action and decided to blame it on someoen else. I don't know, I think the woman made the best decision she can and the other car driver is partially reponsible. I don't think you can say the woman didn't take responbility of her decision, that's totally unrelated to her later decicision to sue the other driver.

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

But I think you professor is meaning that she is blaming the driver for terminating her pregnancy, therefore suing, when she had in fact decided to abort. So it wasn't the accident that caused her to decide on the abortion but rather her choice to not take chance of having a teratologic baby because she made decisions without realizing she was pregnant. I think the point benig that the woman shouldn't sue the driver for losing her pregnancy when she din't even realize that she was pregnant when the accident occured and made decisions based on her knowledge at the time. Not that I agree with one over the other, but there is way too much suing going on in the States. BTW, congrats on your genetics exam!!!

12:18 PM  
Blogger Carol said...

I can understand my professor & your view, I mean, I know she is blaming the other driver for her ultimate lose of pregnancy. But to me, her lost of pregnancy is because of the accident, and the other drive should at least be partially responsible for it. Overall, it's tough to decide....

2:33 PM  
Blogger tsengster said...

i think you can kinda see the situation as if the pt had injured a leg in the accident: would she sue the other driver(s) still had she "voluntarily" decides to amputate the leg due to slightly crippled after-evemt and/or possibility of infections from injury.

i guess a fetus may be more valuable than a leg? kinda the same idea though i guess?

what a world of medical ethics. these always stir heated debates at school!

7:57 PM  
Blogger Carol said...

I know, very heated debate topics here.

I guess I just can't see a baby as "slightly defect", to me, it's just hard to imaging to raise a handicapped child, it's not fair for him/her, because who will take care of him/her when i am gone......

ok, I am going off topics now....

10:45 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home